- 2


  • Humphrey 91a W.S. Humphrey, D.H. Kitson, and J. Gale, A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, Austin, TX, 13-17 May 1991, pp. 38-49.  
  • Humphrey 91b W.S. Humphrey, Process Fitness and Fidelity,Proceedings of the Seventh International Software Process Workshop, 1618 October 1991.  
  • IEEE-STD-610 ANSI/IEEE Std 610.12-1990, IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, February 1991.  
  • Imai 86 M. Imai, Kaizen: The Key to Japans Competitive Success, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1986.  
  • Juran 88 J.M. Juran, Juran on Planning for Quality, Macmillan, New York, NY, 1988.  
  • Juran 89 J.M. Juran, Juran on Leadership for Quality, The Free Press, New York, NY, 1989.  
  • Kitson 92 D.H. Kitson and S. Masters, An Analysis of SEI Software Process Assessment Results: 19871991, Software Ingineering Institute, CMU/SEI-92-TR-24, July 1992.  
  • Paulk 91 M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis, et al, Capability Maturity Model for Software, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/ SEI-91-TR-24, ADA240603, August 1991.  
  • Paulk 93a M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis, and C.V. Weber, Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, February 1993. Paulk 93b M.C. Paulk, C.V. Weber, S. Garcia, M.B. Chrissis, and M. Bush,  
  • Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-93-TR-25, February 1993.  
  • Radice 85 R.A. Radice, J.T. Harding, P.E. Munnis, and R.W. Phillips, A Programming Process Study, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 24, No.2, 1985.  
  • Siegel 90 J.A.L. Siegel, et al., National Software Capacity: Near-Term Study, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-90-TR-12, ADA226694, May 1990.  
  • Weber 91 C.V. Weber, M.C. Paulk, C.J. Wise, and J.V. Withey, Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-91-TR-25, ADA240604, August 1991.  



  •